Live Blogging the Franzen Guardian Essay

Live Blogging the Franzen Guardian Essay Franzen offers a swift upper cut.to just about everyone. Last Friday, The Franzen â€" he, The Jonathan, of some writerly repute for novels of the paper variety â€" unleashed upon the world 6,400 words decrying just about everything invented after 1995. This piece, published on the Internet (Guardian, to be precise), was actually an excerpt from an upcoming book on Karl Kraus, an Austrian satirist and essayizzzzzzzzz. (Sorry, what happened?)   So if you have $27 and a streak of masochism, you can pick up The Kraus Project: Essays by Karl Kraus on Oct. 1. And but so, chances are, you havent traversed Franzens entire excerpt, which Guardian link-baitedly titled Jonathan Franzen: whats wrong with the modern world. Its okay â€" we understand, you probably got the gist on Twitter anyway. And, its not hard to find summaries of the piece around the web â€" heres a particularly good one from Vulture. But if you want a few easy jokes at The Franzens expense, follow along below as I live blog a reading of the full piece. The First Chuckle: About five paragraphs in, after quoting his beloved Austrian dude, and comparing a point his beloved Austrian dude is trying to make to todays PC vs. Mac debate, Franzen comments on his annoyance at Apples advertising tactics: The argument was eminently reasonable, but it was delivered by a  personified Mac (played by the actor Justin Long) of such insufferable smugness that he made the miseries of  Windows attractive by comparison.  Insufferable smugness, you say? Oh sweet, sweet pot â€" Id like you to meet kettle. Second Chuckle: Franzen tells us: One of the worst things about the internet is that it tempts everyone to be a sophisticate â€" to take  positions on what is hip and to  consider, under pain of being considered unhip, the positions that everyone else is taking. Wait, what? Id say, much more so, the Internet actually tempts everyone to be a knuckle-dragging assbag. Have you read the comments sections? Getting To The Headline-Maker: Were not even 1,000 words in yet, and here we have the most-quoted sentence: But I confess to feeling some version of (Krauss) disappointment when a novelist who I believe ought to  have known better, Salman Rushdie, succumbs to Twitter. The choice of words here is significant, and interesting â€" succumbs to Twitter. As if there were no other choice, and the venerable Rushdie did so on pain of irrelevance. This is Salman freakin Rushdie were talking about here. Lots more boring stuff about Kraus and Vienna in 1910, and how America in 2013 is similar, and some political stuff, and setting up his rail against technology Twitter Is Cigarettes: This is just a good ol WTF?! But not long ago, when I was intemperate enough to call Twitter dumb in public, the response of Twitter addicts was to call me a Luddite. Nyah, nyah, nyah! It was as if Id said it was dumb to smoke cigarettes, except that in this case I had no medical evidence to back me up. Franzen is quoting Kraus again. Explaining what Kraus means. Not succeeding in being interesting. Get a Haircut, Hippie!: Franzen complains thats it too easy to look up stuff on iPhones instead of just remembering stuff. Then, this: But Im enough of a child of the 60s to see a difference between letting your spouse remember your nieces birthdays and handing over basic memory function to a global corporate system of control.  Dude, it seems to me that if youre truly a child of the 60s, youd welcome any opportunity not to have to store memories in your bong-resin and LSD-coated noodle. Whew, were at the halfway point. Time to take a break to check Twitter. We Wouldnt Like Franzen When Hes Angry: I was a white, male, heterosexual American with good friends and perfect health. And yet, for all my privileges, I became an extremely angry person. Then, Franzen relates an anecdote about throwing German coins around a train platform in 1982 because hes mad he didnt score with a German girl in Munich. Its a bizarre little tangent. But its a funny image. Some stuff about how being a novelist made him less angry, supposedly, how he came to admire Kraus, and how Kraus inspired him to expose Amuuuricas contradictions in the same way Kraus had exposed Austrias. Whoa, Unnecessarily Mean Cheap Shot!: so literary novelists are conscripted into Jennifer-Weinerish self-promotion. That was just cold. Some stuff about why Amazon is ruining books, specifically paper books. Oh, Franzen, I Cant Quit You:  Franzen questions how many Amazon reviews are legitimate (as many as 1/3 are not, he quotes some source), and then offers a scenario in which well all be saved: Maybe an economically significant number of readers will come to recognise the human and cultural costs of Amazonian hegemony and go back to local bookstores or at least to barnesandnoble.com, which offers the same books and a superior e-reader, and whose owners have progressive politics. Huh?: Twitters and Facebooks latest models for making money still seem to me like one part pyramid scheme, one part wishful thinking, and  one part repugnant panoptical surveillance. Franzens doctorate at Harvard Business School no doubt positions him well to tell internet businesses how to turn a profit. Oh, wait Wrapping Up: Franzens farewell: As long as modernity lasts, all days will feel to someone like the last days of humanity. Sheesh, what a drama queen. ____________________________ Sign up for our newsletter to have the best of Book Riot delivered straight to your inbox every week. No spam. We promise. To keep up with Book Riot on a daily basis, follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, , and subscribe to the Book Riot podcast in iTunes or via RSS. So much bookish goodnessall day, every day.